https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0btxIVcX6M&feature=youtu.be
we thought we'd break down the final question in a text post in order to go into more details about forms and conventions.
Our coursework 'Wild Things' challenged conventions of the music video. Instead of using conventional cutaways of the artist playing the music, we cast the artist as the mysterious protagonist of the piece. We made this choice to compliment the genre of the music. Since the artist predominantly uses drum kits, and samplers, it would be extremely difficult to stage any 'live performance' true to the song in the video.
![]() |
An image of Low Res as the protagonist of the piece. |
Equally, we also used conventions of music videos, in that we used the video as a promotional tool for the artist, this, perhaps the greatest staple of the music video. We
included images of the EP's cover art at the end and included the description of the release date and download link. Furthermore, the use of Low Res as a protagonist can be seen as a promotional tool.
![]() |
Details of the EP's release at the end of the video |
Further, it could be seen that we used a conventional narrative structure for our music video. Our piece is supported by Craig Davis' narrative theory, whereby he states "Music video narrative involves either illustration, amplification or disjuncture.' Simply, Davis refers to images within a music video either resembling the literal meaning of the lyrics, involving creative interpretation of these lyrics, or being completely abstract and even juxtaposing the lyrics. The piece's woodland setting could be seen as a form of 'amplification'; whilst not indicative of the songs lyrics it involved our creative interpretation of the music. As our piece was befitting of one of Davis' three categories, it could be seen as conventional.